MEDICAL CONSENT FORMS: A LEGAL ANALYSIS UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986

Nov. 13, 2020, 10:07 a.m.   madhavgawri1  
Pens of Law students   Public Policy    


I. Introduction

The term “consent” has always been an area of attraction in the legal field. Legal jurisprudence usually requires the consent of capable persons (people who have attained the age of majority) in order to validate various kinds of transactions, else the transactions would be void or voidable in the eyes of law. The word “consent” finds place in various legislations such as the Indian Contract Act, the Indian Penal Code, etc. However, consent in medical situations is a very complex deal. But before delving into this aspect, one needs to understand the relationship between doctor and patient.

II. The Relationship Between Patient Under The Consumer Protection Act, 1986

The Supreme Court in Indian Medical Association v. V.P. Shantha & Ors.[i] expressly observed that patient is a “consumer” and the medical assistance provided by him/her was a “service”. The Court held that, “Service rendered to a patient by a medical practitioner (except where the doctor renders service free of charge to every patient or under a contract of personal service), by way of consultation, diagnosis and treatment, both medicinal and surgical, would fall within the ambit of 'service' as defined in Section 2(1) (o) of the Act.” Thus, the services rendered by medical practitioners shall fall within the ambit of the Consumer Protection Act, and the patients aggrieved by any deficiency in treatment, from both private clinics and Govt. Hospitals, are entitled to seek damages under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986

With this background, since the consumer has a right to be informed about the treatment to be undertaken and the associated risks and benefits, it becomes necessary for the medical fraternity to obtain “informed consent” from the patients, which is usually obtained in the form of “medical consent forms”. However, these forms usually enumerates the patient’s consent to any form of treatment which is a blanket consent whose legal validity can obviously be questioned. This consent form needs to be signed before the treatment is started, which is generally used by the doctors as defence in cases of medical negligence.

III. What Is Consent?

The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 does not define the term “consent”. However, the term has been defined under section 13 of the Indian Contracts Act which provides that, “Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same manner.” Consent is of various forms: Implied, Express, Blanket, Informed, etc. In the case of medical consent forms, there is a requirement of informed consent on the part of the patient. The concept of informed consent requires that the patient should be explained all information in comprehensible and non-medical terms preferably in local terms about (a) diagnosis (b) nature of treatment (c) risks involved (d) prospects of success (e) prognosis if the procedure is not informed, and (f) alternative methods of treatments.[ii]

The informed consent doctrine was evolved in the case of Canterbury v. Spence wherein the court emphasised on patient’s right to know all material risks and conferred an obligation on the doctors to disclose all the associated risks with treatment and a failure to do so on the part of the doctors would amount to medical negligence.[iii] The first Indian case which emphasized on the importance of informed consent was Ram Bihari Lal v. Dr JN Srivastava.[iv] In this case, the patient was suspected to have appendicitis. However, when operated her appendix was found to be normal. Despite this, the doctor removed her gall bladder in the interest of the patient but in doing so, the doctor exceeded the limits of the consent obtained by the patient. Thus, the doctor acted as per traditional paternalistic notion which was unacceptable in the legal regime and hence, the doctor was held liable for operating sans valid consent.

IV. Who Can Give Consent Under A Medical Consent Form?

Any person who is conscious, mentally sound and is of and above twelve years of age can provide consent for the purpose of clinical examinations, diagnosis and treatment.[v] If one examines the medical consent form, one can deduce that the consent to carry out the medical surgery or operation can not only be given by the patient himself/herself but also by any related person to the patient, such as mother, father, husband, wife, etc. However, the Supreme Court in the case of Samira Kohli v. Prabha Manchanda and Ors.[vi] explicitly held that when the patient is an adult and is competent to give consent, then there is no point of obtaining consent from someone else in his/her behalf. In the present case, the doctor obtained the consent of the mother of the patient in order to perform a hysterectomy and as a consequence, removed her reproductive organs due to which she suffered premature menopause. The Court held that “since consent was not obtained from the patient, the act constituted an unauthorised invasion and interference with appellant’s body. Hence, the act amounted to a tortious act of assault and battery. As a consequence, the doctor was held liable under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for deficiency in services.” Thus, one can infer that the consent of the patient cannot be justified by a general consent obtained from the relatives of the patient unless there is a situation of emergency. Hence, the judgment upheld the concept of patient autonomy, which is an accepted principle in medical ethics.

V. Medical Consent Forms: An Unfair Trade Practice

Recently, the Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in the case of Vinod Khanna v. R.G. Stone Urology Hospital and Ors. held that, “The use of pre-printed and fixed “informed consent cum undertaking “ forms by the hospitals to record consent from the patients amounts to “unfair trade practice” within the meaning of section 2(1)(r) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.”[vii] The Hon’ble NCDRC observed that, “However, we cannot ignore the peculiarity of the ‘informed consent’ in the instant case which needs prompt and proper rectification. It is pertinent to note that it is a pre-printed form- ‘informed consent cum undertaking’ having blank spaces for limited selective handwritten entries and for the signatures. The main body of the form is fixed pre-printed. Such consent form fits into any procedure, any doctor, and any patient. Thus, it will take shape of informed consent if someone after filling up the blank spaces in handwriting and affixing the signatures of the patient and his sister as a witness. This to be administrative arbitrariness and one-sided high handedness, and to be unfair and deceptive, on the part of the OP-1 (hospital); though the complainant has not been prejudiced in this particular case.” What is interesting to note is that though no medical negligence per se was found in the present case, the Hon’ble NCDRC imposed a penalty of Rs. 10 lacs on the account that “pre-printed consent form with blank spaces for handwritten entries” amounts to unfair trade practice.[viii]

VI. Conclusion

The interesting fact to be noted here is that the term “healthcare” has not been included in the definition of “service” under section 2(42) of the present Consumer Protection Act, 2019 which implies that the medical profession has been excluded from the purview of the 2019 Act. However, the mention of the phrase “means and is not limited to” in the definition of service makes it clear that the services rendered by the medical fraternity can be considered as services and hence, fall within the scope of Consumer Protection Act. Since medical consent forms have not proved to be a sufficient defence to protect the medical fraternity, that is why the above-mentioned amendment had been included in the 2019 Act.

[Keywords]: Medical Consent Forms, Patient, Doctor, Informed, service, unfair trade practice.

[Profile of the author]: Shubhangi Komal is a 5th year Law student in National University of Study and Research in Law, Ranchi and holds keen interest in constitutional, criminal, environmental, labour and human rights laws.

[FAQs]: What is a Blanket Consent?

Ans: It refers to consent taken to cover everything done to patient without specific mentioning the procedure. Blanket consent is legally inadequate for any procedure that has risks or alternatives.

[i] AIR 1996 SC 550.

[ii] Consumer Protection Act and Medical Profession-Consent, MedIndia https://www.medindia.net/indian_health_act/consumer_protection_act_and_medical_profession_consent.htm

[iii] Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772, 782 (C.A.D.C. 1972).

[iv] Ram Bihari Lal v Dr. J. N. Srivastava. AIR 1985 MP 150.

[v] Indian Penal Code, §§ 88 and 90 (1860).

[vi] Samera Kohli v Dr. Prabha Manchanda and Another. 2008 (1) SCALE 442.

[vii] “Informed Consent Cum Undertaking” Form Used by the Hospitals, is amount to Unfair Trade Practice: NCDRC, India Legal (July 9, 2020) https://www.indialegallive.com/constitutional-law-news/courts-news/informed-consent-cum-undertaking-form-used-by-hospitals-is-amount-to-unfair-trade-practice-ncdrc/

[viii] Vinod Khanna v. R.G. Stone Urology Hospital and Ors., Consumer Case No. 428 of 2018.


Liked the article ?
Share this:

Tags

india ads fairnesscreams tv ads ban proposal anti ageing creams government 2006 micro small review enterprises development act big India Juvenile Justice Women justice Jurisdiction Constitution caa secularism amendment sedition Arbitration consumer complaint filing international laws wildlife protection animal laws USA china women empowerment pornography legal prostitution sex trafficking laws legalising Economy Measures RBI Coronavirus Reserve Bank of India stability coronavirus impact liquidity shantikanta das monetary policy repo rate moratorium disinformation fake news state of frenzy social media anger hate issue EpidemicDiseaseAct uniformcivilcode equality secular illegalimmigrants immigration assisteddying euthanasia police brutality custodial violence police efforts jail separation divorce hindu marriage family laws economic slowdown unemployment percapitaincome inflation GDP growth aggregate demand commercial surrogacy bill armed forces equal rights landmark judgement indian army transgender living conditions third gender Disability rights rape law Criminal law IPC regulatory sandbox IRDA framework IRDA guidelines live environment RBI regulations pollution womeninmates punishment sexualassault wrongfulconvictions IPR EnvironmentLaws JudicialActivism Jurisprudence Internship singleparent adoption niti manthan phase 1 prison reforms Phase 1 Niti manthan e-fradus cyber crimes It Laws Medico legal aid Media technology and democracy legal literacy Body Offences Housing infrastructure Infra accessibility for the persons with disability indian law global laws right to health fundamental right article 21 Indian penal code criminal law crimes against women rapecases IntellectualPropertyRights Trademark NuclearSecurity Cyberlaws judiciary petitions mercy petition review petition curative petition zero draft human rights business United nations ADR Law mediation Alternative dispute resolution mechanism negotiation conciliation Mahatama Gandhi Gandhian Concept of Law economics technology technological unemployment network online consumption production working remotely law of sedition article 19 right to freedom and expression moblynching violence offence animalrights gayparenting pronouns fundamental duties Indian law Constitution of India covid19 criminal justice system constitutional administrative litigation Courts order commission report speedy trial Corrections legal aid legislature Police Successionlaw casestudy SARFAESI e-debate maritalrape 498A IPC Misuse nirbhaya rape case death penalty deterent theory covid-19 force majuere events Force Majeure Clauses coronavirus outbreak doctorine of frustration clauses contract UAPA 2019 Review indigenous people LabourLaws Familylaw dowry death white collar crimes plea bargaining menstruation myths defamation forgery events Results Phase 2 trespass mental health Patent rights crimes lockdown child abuse traditional crime crime rate phishing ransomware cybercrime malware domestic violence doctoring lis pendens applicability conditions insensitive media coverage media Death News channel ayodhya judgement Group Discussion Exceprts naturaljustice legalprincipals Supremecourt crpc Bail Legalethics legal guidelines telemedicine legal issues Laws Section 269 Section 270 cholera privacy concern Divorce Muslim Women retention of property yemen conflict competition law 10 years administrativelaw PiracyLaw juvenile justice EIA Draft 2020 30th June 2020 Environmental Impact Assessment Climate Change Laws Dissent Research Group juvenile crimes Administration environment conservation Sustainable Oceans Énvironment Service laws Compassionate Appointments policy legislation webinar scientist climatologist report policy change TPA property patent law section 144 principles of natural justice justice delayed instant justice work from home InformationTechnology persons with disabilities discrimination health girls disease community duties individual contemporary world common interests duality MRTP Act Indian economy competition commission of india Competition Act appraisal singaporean court section 377 Navtej singh judgement IHL war crimes humanitarian law ipc beyond india extra territorial jurisdiction wife maintenance desertion marriage #digital strike #cyber security chinese apps #chinese apps #ad-hoc arbitration #institutional arbitration #environmental law #environment #human rights #strict liability Lok Adalats US-India Abortion laws Live-in-relationships Indian Judiciary Universal Healthcare Rules Based World Order. YL3 victim dying declaration wish last wish truth balanced cooperative bank sarfaesi act Internet Ban Censorship Website Ban #DPSP #state #covid #IP black money racism Skin colour Political system Unrest accountability Jammu and Kashmir Article 370 Abrogation Kidnapping and Abduction Indo-Nepal brutality dk basu guidelines Conflict Changing dynamics democracy prostitution in India extradition laws and treaties Surrogacy laws case study Law and Order society Legal Implications regulatory framework Betting Gambling Seventh Schedule Central Government Betting Laws cyber delinquency Juvenile Justice Act Doctrine Part Performance Section 53-A CERC sustainable development Grid Code electricity laws electricity control Mental HealthCare Act WHO National Trust Act Disaster Mangement Indian legal Framework Female Criminality social structure Corporate Laws Corporate Veil Company Election Laws Electoral Reforms Law Commission of India Article 324 Election Commission contempt of court rule of law supreme court principle of natural justice judges criticism high court Fertility Assisted Reproductive Technology Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill Legal Evolution Literature growth goods and services Predatory Pricing Market legal remedies cryptocurrency virtual currency santhanam committee ethical behavior border LAC Aksai Chin revenge porn FIR SC/ ST Reservation artificialintelligence Privacy privacy specialmarriageact constitutional constitutionality Article 139A Education National Education Policy HRDMinistry feminism Gender Inequality Sex god juristic personality PIL earth nature ecosystem public trust Section 420 ASCI Advertisements Covid-19 Online Dispute Resolution dispute JusticeOnTime Cyber Space election Cloning Senior citizens Human Rights arrest CrPC procedural laws curative legislation Ration card Judicial Review Writ Jurisdiction indian passport foreigners-act extradition law laws in India Inheritance Laws Section 6 Domicile CLAT NLU belgium extradition treaty vicarious liability law of torts common law International Commercial Arbitration Private Defence Legal Right energy consumption national solar mission international law economic sanction tax structure Reforms NDPS Act Section64A genocide research projects internships summer school Virtual Courts Digital India NDHM Press Regulation italian-marines fishermen kerala international waters arbitration womenrights witchhunting janaushadischeme medical national health policy healthcare national digital health mission world health organisation legal jurisprudente draft health data management 2020 concerns drawbacks ministry of health and family affair sting operations media trial press rights right to privacy Twitter Prashant Bhushan period leave probate essentials for will will Technical biometrics Laws for women settlement mandalcommission 30 years gandhi principles Indianlegalsystem CELRA Climate Change Phase 3 sakshiaggarwal communication skills youcanskilldevelopment client counselling soumikghoshal sbi protest farm acts agriculture farmers anti-farmers men Executive power constitutional law Article 73 finance transparency political parties bonds Sexual Harassment Ministry of Human Resource Development Educational Reforms sabarimala case untouchability cruelty misuse by women gender biased 488A ban of apps section 69A tiktok app compensation section 357A state s bankruptcy Insolvency_law_committee insolvency_bankruptcy_act insolvency nclt students accessibility #righttoeducation nuclear weapon treaty legality advisory opinion international restorative justice punishment theory copyright law distance education virtual teaching SC/ST Forest Rights Act Forest Conservation vaccination love jihad ibc suspension financial creditors ministry of corporate affairs symbol substantial acquisition takeover public announcement control rape culture sacred ashwatthama mythology out of court settlement history banking law sebi stressed assets banking regulation dispute resolution professionalism private sector fund sourcing banks code of wages worker wage publication copyright infringement publishing house penguin environmental jurisprudence 2020 indian legal system