Overview: JUVENILE BE TREATED AS ADULTS

March 17, 2021, 8:25 p.m.   Dheerja  
Pens of Law students    


Profile of the Author: Aditi Dhamdhere of Modern Law College, Pune University.

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile Crime isn’t normally conceived in the child but it is to a great extent present in him as a result of the environmental factors that he is raised in, his silly activities, or just absence of order and appropriate training.

As Fredrick Douglass says: It is simpler to assemble solid youngsters than to fix broken men. The young are respected to be perhaps the best resource of a nation. If this population isn’t all around prepared the eventual fate of a nation would unquestionably not be extremely splendid. We all have to provide youngsters with a sound situation to contemplate and develop in. The most widely recognized explanation behind a youngster to conflict with the law is either absence of training or faults in their childhood that is because of unfortunate social conditions bringing about the child to turn out to be truly and intellectually ill-suited just as an irresponsible citizen. Reasonable and comparable possibilities must be given to all adolescents to decrease awkwardness and assurance inculcating social value in the nation. Children are relied upon to be devoted, aware, and have great virtue. Nonetheless, because of specific conditions, a few youngsters can’t follow the set social and lawful announcement. These youngsters regularly engage in criminal conduct which is known as Juvenile Delinquency or Juvenile Crime [i].

JUVENILES BE TREATED AS ADULTS

This is a disputable subject dependent on the way that most adolescents are crashed into certain wrongdoings by peer pressure. It should depend upon the gravity of the crime committed; juveniles should be tried as adults if the crimes that they have carried out are heinous. Everyone makes a mistake be it a teenager. However, regardless of how old one is, murder or rape are not the crimes that are committed without the culprit putting thought into it. Any teenager who torments and slaughters an individual or commits rape which is heinous and grave in nature crime ought not to be treated as a child. There should be no excuse for teenagers who carry out crimes that break the law, they should not be allowed to live a normal life otherwise they will keep on committing the crimes. They must be punished by law [ii].

There are many reasons for juvenile delinquency such as family background, financial condition, a trend of alcoholism, peer pressure, film and social media, etc., [iii].

In the case of Mukesh and Ors. v. State of Delhi known as the “Delhi Gang Rape” case, an adolescent, who was few months less to 18 years have been condemned to 3 years custodial sentence, notwithstanding, it was said that he was the active member in the assault. People were outraged due to this and it was contended that there is a need to amend the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2000.

In another case of Sanjay Suri v. Delhi Administration, [iv] the Supreme Court ordered the arrival of adolescent undertrial detainees. The judgment additionally featured that the prison specialists will not acknowledge the age of the adolescent until and except if the age is explicitly referenced in the reports supporting confinement.

In the case of Jayendra v. State of UP, [v] the High Court ordered sending a youngster to detainment for committing an offence was challenged before the Supreme Court and the reports submitted by the medical authorities proved the age of the youngster, the sentence for detainment was suppressed and the convict was released immediately.

In another case of Munna v. State of UP, [vi] the Supreme Court held that regardless of whether a youngster is seen as an offender he ought not to be abused. They ought not to bolt up their fundamental rights when they enter prison.

In the case of Bhoop Ram v. State of UP, [vii] the Supreme Court followed the decision of Jayendra v. State of UP and it was held that the hour of the commission of an offence is adequate to decide the age of an individual.

In the case of Raj Singh v. State of Haryana, [viii] the Supreme Court held that the age of the child must be resolved at the hour of the event of an offence.

VARIOUS PROVISIONS UNDER LAWS IN INDIA

Constitutional Provisions

Article 15(3) [ix] gives the state power to make certain laws for women and children. Article 39(f) [x] stipulates that the children should be given chances and they should be ensured against misuse and good and material relinquishment.

Indian Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPc) Provisions

Section 82 [xi] of the Indian Penal Code provides that nothing is an offence that is committed by a child less than 7 years of age. Below the age of 7 years, no newborn child can be blamed for a crime. Section 83 [xii] provides an act of a child over 7 and under the age of 12 who has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and consequences of his conduct. Section 27 [xiii] of CrPc provides that any individual who at the date of appearing before the court is under 16 years old isn’t culpable with death or detainment forever.

Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection) Act, 2000 & 2015

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act was passed in 2000. The principal target of the new Act was to guarantee that no child up to the age of 18 years is held up in prison. The Act additionally made arrangements for the foundation and care, assurance, and recovery of children. It empowers the Juvenile Justice Board (prior called Juvenile Court) in adopting a multi-disciplinary strategy when conducting an inquiry. Under the Act, the Child Welfare Committee has been built up to take into account the requirements of weak children [xiv].

New Act managing Juvenile delinquency came in 2015 where the age of the adolescent was decreased from 18 years to 16 years, that is, any child who has committed any heinous crime under the age of 16 to 18 years will be treated as an adult. The force is comprised of the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) to choose whether the adolescent is to be sent to a recovery home or tried as an adult [xv].

CONCLUSION

A child who commits heinous crimes like rape and murder should be tried and offered punishment as adults. Juvenile courts should be tough to ensure juveniles do not take advantage of immunity from prosecution. Juveniles in rehabilitation should also be offered significant psychological help. Children represent the future of tomorrow so should be offered reasonable consideration. Reducing the age of juvenile delinquents from 18 years to 16 years as referenced in Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015 isn’t an answer. The administration should attempt to implement the Act appropriately and they should follow the reformative methodology and attempt to engage juveniles in some skilled work with the goal that they can lead a peaceful life afterwards.

Disclaimer: This article is an original submission of the Author. Niti Manthan does not hold any liability arising out of this article. Kindly refer to our Terms of use or write to us in case of any concerns.


FAQ

Q1. Why Juveniles be tried as Adults?

A1. A juvenile who commits heinous crimes like rape and murder should be tried and offered punishment as adults. Juvenile courts should not be a road to immunity from prosecution.

REFERENCES

[i] Kashish Mathur, Juvenile Delinquency in India Causes and Prevention, <http://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-1724-juvenile-delinquency-in-india-causes-and-prevention-.html> accessed in August 2020.

[ii] Times Reporter, DEBATE: Should courts treat juveniles like adults? April 22, 2016, <https://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/read/199167> accessed in August 2020.

[iii] Anubhav Pandey, Challenges to Juvenile Justice Laws in India, Sept.12, 2018, <https://blog.ipleaders.in/juvenile-justice-2/#_ftnref7> accessed in August 2020.

[iv] Sanjay Suri v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1986 SC 414.

[v] Jayendra v. the State of UP, AIR 1982 SC 685.

[vi] Munna v. the State of UP, AIR 1982 SC 806.

[vii] Bhoop Ram v. the State of UP, AIR 1987 SC 1329.

[viii] Raj Singh v. the State of Haryana, 2000 (6) SCC 759.

[ix] Article 15 (3) of the Constitution of India.

[x] Article 39 (f) of the Constitution of India.

[xi] Section 82, KD Gaur, Textbook on Indian Penal Code, 6th Edition, 2018, Pg.No.-191.

[xii] Section 83, KD Gaur, Textbook on Indian Penal Code, 6th Edition, 2018, Pg.no.-193.

[xiii] Section 27, The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

[xiv] Juvenile Justice (Care And Protection Of Children) Act, 2000.

[xv] Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.


Liked the article ?
Share this:

Tags

india ads fairnesscreams tv ads ban proposal anti ageing creams government 2006 micro small review big India Juvenile Justice rights Women justice Jurisdiction Constitution caa secularism amendment sedition Arbitration consumer complaint filing international laws wildlife protection animal laws USA china women empowerment pornography legal prostitution sex trafficking laws legalising Economy Measures RBI Coronavirus Reserve Bank of India stability coronavirus impact liquidity shantikanta das monetary policy repo rate moratorium disinformation fake news state of frenzy social media anger hate issue EpidemicDiseaseAct uniformcivilcode equality secular illegalimmigrants immigration assisteddying euthanasia police brutality custodial violence police efforts jail separation divorce hindu marriage family laws economic slowdown unemployment percapitaincome inflation GDP growth aggregate demand commercial surrogacy bill armed forces equal rights landmark judgement indian army transgender living conditions third gender Disability rights rape law Criminal law IPC Internship Program regulatory sandbox IRDA framework IRDA guidelines live environment RBI regulations pollution womeninmates punishment sexualassault wrongfulconvictions IPR EnvironmentLaws JudicialActivism Jurisprudence Internship singleparent adoption niti manthan prison reforms Niti manthan e-fradus cyber crimes It Laws Medico legal aid Media technology and democracy legal literacy Body Offences Housing infrastructure indian law global laws right to health fundamental right article 21 Indian penal code criminal law crimes against women rapecases IntellectualPropertyRights Trademark NuclearSecurity Cyberlaws judiciary petitions mercy petition review petition curative petition zero draft human rights business United nations ADR Law mediation negotiation conciliation Mahatama Gandhi economics technology technological unemployment network online consumption production working remotely law of sedition article 19 right to freedom and expression moblynching violence offence animalrights gayparenting pronouns fundamental duties Indian law Constitution of India covid19 criminal justice system constitutional administrative litigation Courts order commission report speedy trial Corrections legal aid legislature Police Successionlaw casestudy SARFAESI e-debate maritalrape 498A IPC Misuse nirbhaya rape case death penalty deterent theory covid-19 force majuere events Force Majeure Clauses coronavirus outbreak doctorine of frustration clauses contract UAPA 2019 Review indigenous people LabourLaws Familylaw dowry death white collar crimes plea bargaining menstruation myths defamation forgery events Results Phase 2 trespass mental health intellectual property rights Patent rights crimes lockdown child abuse traditional crime crime rate phishing ransomware cybercrime malware domestic violence doctoring lis pendens applicability conditions insensitive media coverage media Death News channel ayodhya judgement Group Discussion Exceprts naturaljustice legalprincipals Supremecourt crpc Bail Legalethics legal guidelines telemedicine legal issues Laws Section 269 Section 270 cholera privacy concern Divorce Muslim Women retention of property yemen conflict competition law enforcement 10 years administrativelaw PiracyLaw juvenile justice EIA Draft 2020 30th June 2020 Environmental Impact Assessment Climate Change Laws Dissent Research Group juvenile crimes Administration environment conservation Sustainable Oceans Énvironment Service laws Compassionate Appointments policy legislation webinar scientist climatologist report policy change TPA property patent law section 144 principles of natural justice justice delayed instant justice work from home InformationTechnology persons with disabilities discrimination health girls disease community duties individual contemporary world common interests duality MRTP Act Indian economy competition commission of india Competition Act appraisal singaporean court section 377 Navtej singh judgement IHL war crimes humanitarian law ipc beyond india extra territorial jurisdiction wife maintenance desertion marriage #digital strike #cyber security chinese apps #chinese apps #ad-hoc arbitration #institutional arbitration #environmental law #environment #human rights #strict liability Lok Adalats US-India Abortion laws Live-in-relationships Indian Judiciary Universal Healthcare Rules Based World Order. YL3 victim dying declaration wish last wish truth balanced cooperative bank sarfaesi act Internet Ban Censorship Website Ban #DPSP #state #covid #IP black money racism Skin colour Political system Unrest accountability Jammu and Kashmir Article 370 Abrogation Kidnapping and Abduction Indo-Nepal brutality dk basu guidelines Conflict Changing dynamics democracy international disputes prostitution in India extradition laws and treaties Surrogacy laws case study Law and Order society Legal Implications regulatory framework Betting Gambling Seventh Schedule Central Government Betting Laws Rights of a Man cyber delinquency Juvenile Justice Act Doctrine Part Performance Section 53-A CERC sustainable development Grid Code electricity laws electricity control Mental HealthCare Act WHO National Trust Act Disaster Mangement Indian legal Framework Female Criminality social structure Corporate Laws Corporate Veil Company Election Laws Electoral Reforms Law Commission of India Article 324 Election Commission contempt of court rule of law supreme court principle of natural justice judges criticism high court Fertility Assisted Reproductive Technology Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill Legal Evolution Literature growth goods and services Predatory Pricing Market legal remedies cryptocurrency virtual currency santhanam committee ethical behavior border military LAC Aksai Chin revenge porn FIR SC/ ST Reservation artificialintelligence Privacy privacy specialmarriageact constitutional constitutionality Article 139A Education National Education Policy HRDMinistry feminism Gender Inequality Sex god juristic personality PIL earth nature ecosystem public trust Section 420 ASCI Advertisements Covid-19 Online Dispute Resolution dispute JusticeOnTime Cyber Space Security election Cloning Senior citizens Human Rights arrest CrPC procedural laws curative legislation Ration card Judicial Review Writ Jurisdiction Internet Covid19 indian passport foreigners-act extradition law laws in India Inheritance Laws Section 6 Domicile CLAT NLU belgium extradition treaty vicarious liability law of torts common law International Commercial Arbitration Private Defence Legal Right energy consumption national solar mission international law economic sanction tax structure Reforms NDPS Act Section64A genocide research projects internships summer school Virtual Courts Digital India NDHM Press Regulation italian-marines fishermen kerala international waters arbitration womenrights witchhunting janaushadischeme healthcare laws medical national health policy healthcare national digital health mission world health organisation legal jurisprudente draft health data management 2020 concerns drawbacks ministry of health and family affair sting operations media trial press rights right to privacy Twitter Prashant Bhushan period leave probate essentials for will will Technical biometrics Laws for women settlement mandalcommission 30 years gandhi principles Indianlegalsystem nitimanthan CELRA Climate Change Phase 3 sakshiaggarwal communication skills youcanskilldevelopment client counselling soumikghoshal sbi protest farm acts agriculture farmers anti-farmers men Executive power constitutional law Article 73 finance transparency political parties bonds Sexual Harassment Ministry of Human Resource Development Educational Reforms sabarimala case untouchability cruelty misuse by women gender biased 488A ban of apps section 69A tiktok app compensation section 357A state s bankruptcy Insolvency_law_committee ibc insolvency_bankruptcy_act insolvency nclt students accessibility internet #righttoeducation nuclear weapon treaty legality advisory opinion international restorative justice punishment theory copyright law distance education virtual teaching Fundamental Rights Rape SC/ST Forest Rights Act Forest Conservation bitcoin vaccination ibc suspension financial creditors ministry of corporate affairs substantial acquisition takeover public announcement control out of court settlement history banking law sebi stressed assets banking regulation dispute resolution professionalism private sector fund sourcing banks publication copyright infringement publishing house penguin environmental jurisprudence 2020 indian legal system acquisition section 62 convertible investees companies act ABUSE ONLINE IPC CRIME WOMEN INDIA ONLINE ABUSE WOMEN CRIME CRIMINAL LAW registrations open competition sushruta apply extempore centre for medical and health law ethic studies sex workers religion extra-territorial technological advancement cerestrial environment_protection infrastructure goa doctrineofpleasure crown Arrest code of civil procedure offender access to justice concilation remedy presidentialelections developing nations tiktok universal health coverage comedians freedom of speech and expression OTT Platforms Content Regulation Section 375 forced marriages Precautionary measures Guidelines covid crisis women assault section 353 cops andhra pradesh chief minister dream 11 economic impact online gambling salary income tax rti spam troll misinformation methods civil law section 118 kerala police act section 66a animal rights slaughter customs act CAROTAR FTA TARRIF rules of origin hardship of importer rights of animals need for amendement meagre punishment legitimacy constitutionalism liability right to healthy environment degrading environment social responsibility restructuring mergers amalgamation turkey challenge accepted outrage unity child rights rte right to education non-access conclusive proof marital relationships matrimony arbitral award thorium atomic energy act nuclear energy nuclear power atomic energy swadhar home widows vrindavan infringement comparative advertisement trademarks act income tax act non resident indians FEMA MONARCHY SIKKIM namgyal dynasty partner state ONUS guilty Burden of proof legal burden parties self defense legal right prostitutes Winter school International Criminal Law Ministry of Finance Welfare Digital Budget Finance Budget 2021 Democracy Coups Myanmar Voter Fraud Corruption corrupt governments voter fraud unrecognized ineffective Dictators projects development jungle capital assets funds partership water riparian basin collaboration advocate amit mazumdar soft skills advocacy terrorism massacres gun ICC ivorycoast LaurentGbagbo Space Policy Treaties Space Outer space Foreign award public policy ZERO FIR LAW hindu law INDIA PROPERTY RIGHTS DAUGHTER WOMEN RIGHTS AMENDEMENTS HINDU SUCCCESSION distributed ledger technology block chains digital age Exception 2 Habeas Corpus Case Basic Structure Doctrine Adults Care and Protection Juvenile delinquency Medical Negligence Due Care Criminal Liability Civil Liability Stockholm Conference Uniform Civil Code Personal Laws hindu wife live in relationships mental disorder mental health care act advance directive bail sentence CEDAW NCRB Sexual abuse International Bill of Rights POCSO Act Comparative analysis Ted Talk Renewable Energy Trend Energy Projection advaadvance directiv,psychiatry Schedule VII of CA 2013 Amendment 2019 Companies Act 2013 CSR Promoting Innovation and Creativity World Intellectual Property Organisation Restructuring Education Global Innovation Index