Mental Healthcare Act, 2017- An Analysis

March 21, 2021, 9:14 p.m.   singhsakshi142211  
Pens of Law students    


INTRODUCTION

Section 2(s) of the Mental Healthcare Act defines-

“mental illness means a substantial disorder of thinking, mood, perception, orientation or memory that grossly impairs judgment, behavior, capacity to recognize reality or ability to meet the ordinary demands of life, mental conditions associated with the abuse of alcohol and drugs, but does not include mental retardation which is a condition of arrested or incomplete development of mind of a person, especially characterized by subnormality of intelligence.”

Health encompasses the composite union of physical, spiritual, mental, and social dimensions according to the World Health Organization (WHO), which recognizes that “mental health and well-being are fundamental to quality of life, enabling people to experience life as meaningful, become creative and active citizens.”

Mental health is significantly different from general health as in certain circumstances mentally ill people may not be in a position to make decisions on their own.

On March 27th of 2017 the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 was passed which got its approval from the Honourable President of India on April 2017.

The act rescinds/revoked the existing Mental Healthcare Act 1987 which had been widely criticized for not recognizing the rights of a mentally ill person and paving the way for isolating such dangerous patients.

The Mental Healthcare Act 2017 aims to provide mental healthcare services for persons with mental illness. It ensures that these persons have a right to live life with dignity by not being discriminated against or harassed. There are many positive/constructive aspects to this bill, but it is not without its shortcomings.

The act has played a massive role in allowing for accessibility to mental health sufferers and provides mental health services to all. This right is meant to ensure that services be accessible, affordable, and of good quality.

It also mandates the provision of mental health services be established and available in every district of the country.

However, keeping in mind the already inadequate medical infrastructure at district and sub-district levels, the financial burden to be borne by the state governments will be huge unless the central government allocates a larger portion of the budget to incur the expenditure.

Yet even during the pandemic, when the mental health crisis is at its most critical the paltry amount designated towards medical health facilities during the budget 2021 is unfortunate.

In our country, where mental illness is considered equal to depression, the obvious financial burden on the government will be too high. For the financial year 2017–2018, the proposed health expenditure of 1.2% of the gross domestic product in India. It is among the lowest in the world and the public health expenditure has consistently declined since 2013–2014. India spends 0.06% of its health budget on mental health care, which is significantly less than what Bangladesh spends (0.44%). Most developed nations spend above 4% of their budgets on mental health research, infrastructure, frameworks, and workforce, according to a 2011 WHO report.

History

After the Second World War, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the UN General Assembly.

Indian Psychiatric Society submitted a draft Mental Health Bill in 1950 to replace the outmoded ILA-1912. Mental Health Act (MHA-87) was finally enacted in 1987 after a long and protracted course.

The main features of the Act were as follows:-

  • Definition of mental illness in a progressive way and introducing the modern concept of their treatment with stress on care and treatment rather than on custody.
  • Establishment of Central/State Mental Health Authority to regulate and supervise the psychiatric hospitals/nursing homes and to advise Central/State Governments on Mental Health matters.
  • Admission in special circumstances in psychiatric hospitals/nursing homes. Provisions of voluntary admission and admission on the reception orders were retained.
  • Role of Police and Magistrate to deal with cases of wandering PMI and PMI cruelly treated.
  • Protection of human rights of PMI.
  • Guardianship and Management of properties of PMI.
  • Provisions of penalties in case of breach of provisions of the Act.

Though having many positive features, the MHA-1987 had been the target of criticism right since its inception. It is alleged to be concerned mainly with the legal procedure of licensing, regulating admissions, and guardianship matters of PMI.

Human rights issues and mental health care delivery were not adequately addressed in this Act.

UNCRPD was adopted in December 2006. It was ratified by the Parliament of India in May 2008.

Countries that have signed and ratified the UNCRPD are required to bring their laws and policies in harmony with it. Therefore, this led to all the disabilities laws in India being put under a process of revision.

The convention marked a paradigm shift in respect of disabilities from a social welfare concern to a human rights issue. The new paradigm is based on the presumption of legal capacity, equality, and dignity. According to article 2 of the convention, PWD will enjoy legal capacity on an equal basis for all aspects of life.

Laws in respect of the PMI are presently at crossroads as most of them are under revision to bring them harmony with the UNCRPD-2006.

Human rights activists are pressing for legal capacity to PMI in absolute terms, whereas psychiatrists are in favor of retaining provision for involuntary hospitalization in special circumstances.

It must be emphasized that the ultimate aim of any legal provision should be the welfare of the PMI and the society at large.

Mental health is different from general health as in certain circumstances mentally ill people may not be in a position to make decisions on their own. Those who suffer rarely get access to appropriate medical treatment as their families try to hide their condition out of a sense of shame.

Excerpts from the Act

Section 3 (3)

“Mental illness of a person shall not be determined based on–

political, economic or social status or membership of a cultural, racial or religious group, or for any other reason not directly relevant to the mental health status of the person;

non-conformity with moral, social, cultural, work or political values or religious beliefs prevailing in a person’s community.”

Section 3(4) “Past treatment or hospitalization in a mental health establishment though relevant, shall not by itself justify any present or future determination of the person’s mental illness.”

Section 3(5) “The determination of a person’s mental illness shall alone not imply or be taken to mean that the person is of unsound mind unless he has been declared as such by a competent court.”

How does it differ from the 1987 Act?

Mentally ill persons often lack the ability to make sound decisions and do not always have someone to speak for them on their behalf. In such a situation, treating physicians is the best to take decisions because patients or their nominated representatives have limited knowledge on mental health and mental illness. Hence, from a physician's perspective, this new directive will definitely lengthen the time of admission of mentally ill persons.

The Act further recognizes the right to community living; right to live with dignity; protection from cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment; treatment equal to persons with physical illness; right to relevant information concerning treatment, other rights and recourses; right to confidentiality; right to access their basic medical records; right to personal contacts and communication; right to legal aid; and recourse against deficiencies in the provision of care, treatment, and services.

The act assures free quality treatment for homeless persons or for those who belong below the poverty line (BPL), even if they do not possess a BPL card.

Not everything is sunshine and rainbows, however. In developing countries like India, persons with mental illness and their situations are being aggravated by socioeconomic and cultural factors, such as lack of access to healthcare, superstition, lack of awareness, stigma, and discrimination. The bill does not direct any provisions to address these factors. The mental healthcare bill does not offer much on prevention and early intervention.

While the new act makes several provisions, it provides no guidelines or rules of implementation.

The legal point of view

While on one hand, a psychiatrist would be most concerned over the patient’s mental diagnosis and the patient’s welfare, the court tends to focus more on the competency of said patient, how much of a risk they can be, and more on the welfare of society rather than the welfare of the person.

Before the 2017 act, India was governed by the mental health act of 1987 which focused n exactly that legal perspective thus inviting scathing critique from many. However, legislations drafted after the eighties tend to give some stress on the rights of people with mental illnesses also.

The 2017 Act envisages the right of the patients to access a range of mental healthcare facilities that weren’t allowed to them before 2017.

In case these services are not available, a person with mental illness (PMI) is entitled to compensation from the state. Various rights such as the right to community living, right to confidentiality, right to access medical records, right to protection from cruelty and inhumane treatment, and right to equality and non-discrimination are all ensured by the law. It does not make distinctions amongst the PMI based on poverty though all destitute and homeless PMI are entitled to free mental health treatment. It restricts electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) without anesthesia and any type of ECT to children and also restricts psychosurgery.

What the 2017 legislation changed was that it bestowed upon PMI a certain autonomy over themselves. Through an advance directive which is a written statement, the person can explain "how they want to be cared" and "how they should not be cared for" in case they become incapacitated because of the mental illness.

Further, any person (except minors) has the right to choose a Nominated Representative (NR) to assist the patient with treatment-related decisions.

Moreover, any information relating to a PMI undergoing treatment in a Mental Health Establishment (MHE) shall not be released to the media without the consent of the PMI.

The media also need to restrain themselves from depicting or disclosing the identity of the PMI during reporting in specific cases that come to media attention. The right to privacy is maintained under the Act.

Prohibitions and Punishments

MHCA, 2017 restricts the procedures such as sterilization (of men or women when intended as a treatment for mental illness), unmodified ECT, seclusion, and chaining. The Act also regulates research on PMI and the use of restraints and neurosurgical treatment for them

According to Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, "Whoever attempts to commit suicide and does any act towards the commission of such offense, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to 1 year or with fine, or with both".

The government has a duty to provide care, treatment, and rehabilitation to a person having severe stress and who attempts to commit suicide, to reduce the risk of recurrence of such an attempt. Punishments prescribed under the Act are too harsh, and there is no provision to assess whether a contravention is accidental, due to practical difficulties, or deliberate.

The relationship between psychiatry and law most often comes into play at the time of treatment of PMI.

Treatment of PMI often involves curtailment of personal liberty of psychiatric patients. Most of the countries in the World have laws regulating the treatment of psychiatric patients. Though there are elaborate descriptions of various forms of mental disorders in various treatises in Ayurveda, the care of the mentally ill in the asylums in India is a British innovation.

Statistics

Common mental disorders (CMDs), including depression, anxiety disorders, and substance use disorders are a huge burden affecting nearly 10.0% of the population.

Depression was reported to be higher in females, in the age-group of 40-49 years, and among those residing in urban metros. Equally high rates were reported among the elderly (3.5%).

In 2013, 36 million years of healthy life were lost to mental illness in China, and 31 million in India. Estimates now suggest that by 2025, 39.6 million years of healthy life will be lost to mental illness in China (10 percent increase), and 38.1 million in India (23 percent increase).

A report by the World Health Organisation (WHO) revealed that 7.5 percent of the Indian population suffers from some form of mental disorder. Mental illnesses constitute one-sixth of all health-related disorders and India accounted for nearly 15% of the global mental, neurological, and substance abuse disorder burden.

Over 300 million people are estimated to suffer from depression, equivalent to 4.4% of the world's total population. According to a study conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, 1 in 40 and 1 in 20 people are suffering from past and current episodes of depression in India.

Challenges

  • The need for services and efforts not to mention finance distribution to reduce the treatment gap
  • There is also a prevalent scarcity of specialists within the field due to a lack of scope. As per reports of 2016, for every 100,000 people in India, there are 0·3 psychiatrists, 0.12 nurses, 0.7 psychologists, and 0.07 social workers while the desirable number is anything above 3 psychiatrists and psychologists per 100,000 people.
  • Training of primary health care doctors and general physicians to be better equipped to handle situations where sensitivity is integral is not paid as much attention as it needs.
  • A poorly informed public and the taboos against seeking any psychiatric help

Way Foreward

  • Increase in public and professional awareness and intervention to reduce stigma and ease the burden of discrimination;
  • Extend and strengthen existing systems of primary care to deliver health services for these disorders;
  • Make cost-effective interventions available to those who will benefit;
  • Mental health services should be accessible, equitable, and affordable
  • The government should downsize large psychiatric hospitals
  • Human resources for mental health must be systematically enhanced through both short-term and long-term strategies
  • There should be a national database of services and human resources available for mental health care in the country and this should be periodically updated.
  • The State and Central Governments should follow a stepped care approach to mental health services
  • Aftercare rehabilitation and reintegration within the society
  • Mental health must be converged with the social, education, labor, and legal sectors. Translational research must be encouraged in all areas
  • Law review and reform needs to occur periodically
  • Limitations imposed on the mentally ill in the area of insurance should be rectified
  • The mental health care of vulnerable groups like children, the elderly, women subject to domestic violence should receive priority attention.

Conclusion

According to the numbers, 56 million Indians suffer from depression and another 38 million Indians suffer from anxiety disorders.

That mental health has a stigma attached to it is an unavoidable factor within Indian society itself. Media gossip antagonizing actresses over the suicide of another actor by the means of black magic is far more believable than that an actor may have suffered from depression to the masses. Merely citing a temporary shift in mood against a complete absence of a deeper and more psychological understanding of the concept is unfortunately what is done.

If we are to start anywhere, we must first start with erasing the negativity surrounding mental illnesses. The taboo must be destroyed and people should be freely allowed to speak up and seek health without fearing what people would say or fearing that their conditions would be chalked up to laziness or being called inconsequential or fake by society.

Mental illnesses are still illnesses and the way you would rest your body when suffering a physical ailment, the brain too needs that rest.

Mental health is real and it sees no privilege or nationality, it sees no race or gender. Anyone can be mentally ill and they are all equally deserving of treatment.

Despite this big burden of mental health issues, unfortunately, it continues to be misunderstood in developing countries like India. The new Mental Healthcare Act 2017 rescinds/revoked the existing Mental Healthcare Act 1987 which had been widely criticized for not recognizing the rights of a mentally ill person.

[ [Author -Sanjana Ratkal is pursuing her second year of BA.LLB from VIT Chennai school of law. ]

[Editor:- Sakshi Arya]


Mental Healthcare Act 2017: Need to Wait and Watch, Abhishek Mishra and Abhiruchi Galhotra, 2018, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5932926/

Indian legal system and mental health, Choudhary Laxmi Narayan, Deep Shikha, Jan 2015 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3705679/

India: Mental Healthcare Act: A Legislation for The People, Sahil Sood, 06 August 2020, https://www.mondaq.com/india/healthcare/972410/mental-healthcare-act-a-legislation-for-the-people

National Mental Health Survey of India, 2015-16, http://www.indianmhs.nimhans.ac.in/Docs/Summary.pdf

WHO Report on mental health 2016

WHO report

Mental Health Care and Human Rights, D Nagaraja Pratima Murthy 2008, https://nimhans.co.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Mental_Health_Care_and_Human_Rights.pdf

Mental Healthcare Act 2017: Need to Wait and Watch, Abhishek Mishra and Abhiruchi Galhotra, 2018, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5932926/


Liked the article ?
Share this:

Tags

india ads fairnesscreams tv ads ban proposal anti ageing creams government 2006 micro small review big India Juvenile Justice rights Women justice Jurisdiction Constitution caa secularism amendment sedition Arbitration consumer complaint filing international laws wildlife protection animal laws USA china women empowerment pornography legal prostitution sex trafficking laws legalising Economy Measures RBI Coronavirus Reserve Bank of India stability coronavirus impact liquidity shantikanta das monetary policy repo rate moratorium disinformation fake news state of frenzy social media anger hate issue EpidemicDiseaseAct uniformcivilcode equality secular illegalimmigrants immigration assisteddying euthanasia police brutality custodial violence police efforts jail separation divorce hindu marriage family laws economic slowdown unemployment percapitaincome inflation GDP growth aggregate demand commercial surrogacy bill armed forces equal rights landmark judgement indian army transgender living conditions third gender Disability rights rape law Criminal law IPC Internship Program regulatory sandbox IRDA framework IRDA guidelines live environment RBI regulations pollution womeninmates punishment sexualassault wrongfulconvictions IPR EnvironmentLaws JudicialActivism Jurisprudence Internship singleparent adoption niti manthan prison reforms Niti manthan e-fradus cyber crimes It Laws Medico legal aid Media technology and democracy legal literacy Body Offences Housing infrastructure indian law global laws right to health fundamental right article 21 Indian penal code criminal law crimes against women rapecases IntellectualPropertyRights Trademark NuclearSecurity Cyberlaws judiciary petitions mercy petition review petition curative petition zero draft human rights business United nations ADR Law mediation negotiation conciliation Mahatama Gandhi economics technology technological unemployment network online consumption production working remotely law of sedition article 19 right to freedom and expression moblynching violence offence animalrights gayparenting pronouns fundamental duties Indian law Constitution of India covid19 criminal justice system constitutional administrative litigation Courts order commission report speedy trial Corrections legal aid legislature Police Successionlaw casestudy SARFAESI e-debate maritalrape 498A IPC Misuse nirbhaya rape case death penalty deterent theory covid-19 force majuere events Force Majeure Clauses coronavirus outbreak doctorine of frustration clauses contract UAPA 2019 Review indigenous people LabourLaws Familylaw dowry death white collar crimes plea bargaining menstruation myths defamation forgery events Results Phase 2 trespass mental health intellectual property rights Patent rights crimes lockdown child abuse traditional crime crime rate phishing ransomware cybercrime malware domestic violence doctoring lis pendens applicability conditions insensitive media coverage media Death murder News channel ayodhya judgement Group Discussion Exceprts naturaljustice legalprincipals Supremecourt crpc Bail Legalethics legal guidelines telemedicine legal issues Laws Section 269 Section 270 cholera privacy concern Divorce Muslim Women retention of property yemen conflict competition law enforcement 10 years administrativelaw PiracyLaw juvenile justice EIA Draft 2020 30th June 2020 Environmental Impact Assessment Climate Change Laws Dissent Research Group juvenile crimes Administration environment conservation Sustainable Oceans Énvironment Service laws Compassionate Appointments policy legislation webinar scientist climatologist report policy change TPA property patent law section 144 principles of natural justice justice delayed instant justice work from home InformationTechnology persons with disabilities discrimination health girls disease community duties individual contemporary world common interests duality MRTP Act Indian economy competition commission of india Competition Act appraisal singaporean court section 377 Navtej singh judgement IHL war crimes humanitarian law ipc beyond india extra territorial jurisdiction wife maintenance desertion marriage #digital strike #cyber security chinese apps #chinese apps #ad-hoc arbitration #institutional arbitration #environmental law #environment #human rights #strict liability Lok Adalats US-India Abortion laws Live-in-relationships Indian Judiciary Universal Healthcare Rules Based World Order. YL3 victim dying declaration wish last wish truth balanced cooperative bank sarfaesi act Internet Ban Censorship Website Ban #DPSP #state #covid #IP black money racism Skin colour Political system Unrest accountability Jammu and Kashmir Article 370 Abrogation Kidnapping and Abduction Indo-Nepal brutality dk basu guidelines Conflict Changing dynamics democracy international disputes prostitution in India extradition laws and treaties Surrogacy laws case study Law and Order society Legal Implications regulatory framework Betting Gambling Seventh Schedule Central Government Betting Laws Rights of a Man cyber delinquency Juvenile Justice Act Doctrine Part Performance Section 53-A CERC sustainable development Grid Code electricity laws electricity control Mental HealthCare Act WHO National Trust Act Disaster Mangement Indian legal Framework Female Criminality social structure Corporate Laws Corporate Veil Company Election Laws Electoral Reforms Law Commission of India Article 324 Election Commission contempt of court rule of law supreme court principle of natural justice judges criticism high court Fertility Assisted Reproductive Technology Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill Legal Evolution Literature growth goods and services Predatory Pricing Market legal remedies cryptocurrency virtual currency santhanam committee ethical behavior border military LAC Aksai Chin revenge porn FIR SC/ ST Reservation artificialintelligence Privacy privacy specialmarriageact constitutional constitutionality Article 139A Education National Education Policy HRDMinistry feminism Gender Inequality Sex god juristic personality PIL earth nature ecosystem public trust Section 420 ASCI Advertisements Covid-19 Online Dispute Resolution dispute JusticeOnTime Cyber Space Security election Cloning Senior citizens Human Rights arrest CrPC procedural laws curative legislation Ration card Judicial Review Writ Jurisdiction Internet Covid19 indian passport foreigners-act extradition law laws in India Inheritance Laws Section 6 Domicile CLAT NLU belgium extradition treaty vicarious liability law of torts common law International Commercial Arbitration Private Defence Legal Right energy consumption national solar mission international law economic sanction tax structure Reforms NDPS Act Section64A genocide research projects internships summer school Virtual Courts Digital India NDHM Press Regulation italian-marines fishermen kerala international waters arbitration womenrights witchhunting janaushadischeme healthcare laws medical national health policy healthcare national digital health mission world health organisation legal jurisprudente draft health data management 2020 concerns drawbacks ministry of health and family affair sting operations media trial press rights right to privacy Twitter Prashant Bhushan period leave probate essentials for will will Technical biometrics Laws for women settlement mandalcommission 30 years gandhi principles Indianlegalsystem nitimanthan CELRA Climate Change Phase 3 sakshiaggarwal communication skills youcanskilldevelopment client counselling soumikghoshal sbi protest farm acts agriculture farmers anti-farmers men Executive power constitutional law Article 73 finance transparency political parties bonds Sexual Harassment Ministry of Human Resource Development Educational Reforms sabarimala case untouchability cruelty misuse by women gender biased 488A ban of apps section 69A tiktok app compensation section 357A state s bankruptcy Insolvency_law_committee ibc insolvency_bankruptcy_act insolvency nclt students accessibility internet #righttoeducation nuclear weapon treaty legality advisory opinion international restorative justice punishment theory copyright law distance education virtual teaching Fundamental Rights Rape SC/ST Forest Rights Act Forest Conservation bitcoin child vaccination ibc suspension financial creditors ministry of corporate affairs substantial acquisition takeover public announcement control out of court settlement history banking law sebi stressed assets banking regulation dispute resolution professionalism private sector fund sourcing banks publication copyright infringement publishing house penguin environmental jurisprudence 2020 indian legal system acquisition section 62 convertible investees companies act ABUSE ONLINE IPC CRIME WOMEN INDIA ONLINE ABUSE WOMEN CRIME CRIMINAL LAW registrations open competition sushruta apply extempore centre for medical and health law ethic studies medical and health law sex workers prevention religion extra-territorial technological advancement cerestrial environment_protection infrastructure goa doctrineofpleasure crown Arrest code of civil procedure offender access to justice concilation remedy presidentialelections developing nations tiktok universal health coverage comedians freedom of speech and expression OTT Platforms Content Regulation Section 375 forced marriages Precautionary measures Guidelines covid crisis women assault section 353 cops andhra pradesh chief minister dream 11 economic impact online gambling salary income tax rti spam troll misinformation data protection methods civil law section 118 kerala police act section 66a animal rights slaughter customs act CAROTAR FTA TARRIF rules of origin hardship of importer separation of power rights of animals need for amendement meagre punishment legitimacy constitutionalism liability right to healthy environment degrading environment social responsibility restructuring mergers amalgamation traffacking turkey challenge accepted outrage unity child rights rte right to education non-access conclusive proof marital relationships matrimony arbitral award thorium atomic energy act nuclear energy nuclear power atomic energy swadhar home widows vrindavan infringement comparative advertisement trademarks act income tax act non resident indians FEMA MONARCHY SIKKIM namgyal dynasty partner state ONUS guilty Burden of proof legal burden parties self defense legal right prostitutes Winter school International Criminal Law Ministry of Finance Welfare Digital Budget Finance Budget 2021 Democracy Coups Myanmar Voter Fraud Corruption corrupt governments voter fraud unrecognized ineffective Dictators projects development jungle capital assets funds partership water riparian basin collaboration advocate amit mazumdar soft skills advocacy terrorism massacres gun ICC ivorycoast LaurentGbagbo Space Policy Treaties Space Outer space Foreign award public policy ZERO FIR LAW INDIA PROPERTY RIGHTS DAUGHTER WOMEN RIGHTS AMENDEMENTS HINDU SUCCCESSION distributed ledger technology block chains digital age Exception 2 Habeas Corpus Case Adults Care and Protection Juvenile delinquency Medical Negligence Due Care Criminal Liability Civil Liability Stockholm Conference Uniform Civil Code Personal Laws mental disorder mental health care act advance directive bail sentence CEDAW NCRB Sexual abuse International Bill of Rights POCSO Act Comparative analysis Ted Talk Renewable Energy Trend Energy Projection advaadvance directiv,psychiatry Schedule VII of CA 2013 Amendment 2019 Companies Act 2013 CSR Promoting Innovation and Creativity World Intellectual Property Organisation Restructuring Education Global Innovation Index American Bar Association Offshoring Legal Services Legal Process Outsourcing Marital Rape executive Payment and Settlement System Act of 2007 anti-money laundering Fintech Online Education Inclusion of Technology 5+3+3+4 Design law students call for papers authors editors medical students coparcenory partition safety acts healthworker Policy change Housing Rent Model law Projects Tenancy Central Vista Project Parliament of India supreme court of India space debris Earth orbit Deportation International Law exploitation convention equity lawyer movement public interest intoxication alcohol defence involuntary Immoral Traffic Prevention Act Euthanasia, Mercy Killing, Passive Euthanasia, Difference between Active and Passive Euthanasia, Aruna Shanbaug Case, Right to life, Article 21, Right to Die, Supreme Court, Guidelines regarding Euthanasia. peace challenges policies public