The importance of Risk Assessment and Mental Health Screening during bail sentence hearing

March 24, 2021, 6:39 p.m.   singhsakshi142211  
Pens of Law students    


After spending 14 years in jail for one of the country’s most ill-reputed crimes committed, Manu Sharma was finally released in early June 2020. The 1999 murder of a model/bartender Jessica Lal shocked the nation when Sharma, the son of a politician, shot her after refusing to serve alcohol. He was released in 2020 for “satisfactory conduct in prison” as per jail reports and lack of opposition from Delhi Police. An accomplice in the same case, Vikas Yadav, abducted and murdered Nitish Katara in 2002 (Feb16-17) with his brother. Yadav is still serving 30 years of a life sentence without remission, with two others convicted. The difference in both cases is somewhat apparent as the accused's intent was taken into consideration. The murder of Jessica Lal was not premediated, as proven by multiple witness accounts and Sharma’s confession. However, the kidnapping and murder of Nitish Katara were motivated as he was an intimate friend to Yadav’s sister, Bharti. Katara’s murder was not only preplanned, but the evidence was also destroyed. It should also be noted that the kidnapping and murder of Nitish Katara took place while Yadav was out on parole from the murder of Jessica Lal. This case explains how vital risk assessment and mental health screening are while granting bail/parole or sentencing an offender.

Need for risk Assessment

It is often noted that if a proper screening process were in place, then the murder of Nitish Katara could have been avoided. This issue presents the need for Criminology as a necessity under the Indian Justice System. The need for a risk assessment framework increases when we observe the role of Conduct Disorder and Anti-Social Personality Disorder in offenders.

Risk assessment is conducted to reduce the risk of reoffending in an offender. The assessment attempts to study the offender’s behavioural factors contributing to committing an offence again. If an offender is eligible for parole and the risk analysis determines that the person will likely commit another crime, then the person’s bail will be rejected. In the Vikas Yadav case, he was accused as an accomplice to Jessica’s murder, but while on parole, he conspired and committed the murder of Nitish Katara. Yadav used his political influence to get the case thrown and influence witnesses, but he was convicted on 6 February 2015. Vikas, on many occasions, showed no guilt or remorse for either of the crimes. It can be theorized that offenders such as Vikas Yadav can fall under the Anti-Social Personality Disorder criteria. But since no such assessment was done to clarify his mental state, no statements can be made regarding his mental condition. Despite a death penalty appeal from Katara’s mother, the Supreme Court decided Vikas and Vishal life terms of 25 years without remission, and Sukhdev Pehalwan gets 20 years life imprisonment without remission. The question arises: How does the severity of the punishment gets decided or justified?

The four main justifications for punishment to offenders convicted for an offence are Deterrence, Incapacitation, Restoration, and Rehabilitation. However, people with Anti-Social Personality disorder do not feel guilty or regret after committing an offence, and thus, it becomes pointless to give them a punishment to rehabilitate. They cannot understand the severity of the crime committed by them, as the crime is committed due to their abnormality and not because of any guilty mind. However, since the crime is committed under the knowledge of the land's law, they are mentally fit to stand trial. The judgements also vary from nation to nation.

Countries like the USA, UK, etc., have laws framed that keep in mind the state of the person accused's mental health. Regulations regarding Anti-Social Personality disorder is not only identified but also measures are taken to deal with them. In the year 1969, Charles Manson orchestrated the mass murders of eight people(including Sharon Tate’s stillborn child) with his cult members. While they were on trial, the prosecution demanded the death penalty, but it changed to life sentences after the Californian capital punishment laws changed in 1972. Since then, the accused have repeatedly filed for parole and have been denied each time. The gruesome nature of the murders contributed to the denial of the parole pleas, and the psychological evaluation of the offenders played an essential part. The case is also critical as it brought forward the need for considering the victims of a violent crime. Doris Tate (Sharon Tate’s mother) helped get the Victim's Rights Bill, which allowed for victim impact statements, passed in California in 1982. According to the National Centre for Victims of Crime, all 50 states now allow victims to speak, either written or orally, at certain legal process phases.

Whereas in India in June 2007, a Supreme Court Bench consisting of Justices Arijit Pasayat and D K Jain differentiated between mental inability and psychopathy. Sentencing a man accused of murdering his wife, the judges stated, "Mere abnormality of mind or partial delusion, irresistible impulse or compulsive behaviour of a psychopath affords no protection under section 84 of the Indian Penal Code". Despite this, Indian law still has to identify and raise specific violent offences by considering the psychological aspect.

According to Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code, the insanity defence is given to the accused who is in a state of an unsound mind when committing the act and/or cannot understand the nature or consequences. As it is a powerful tool for avoiding criminal charges, the defence of insanity may be exploited. It isn't easy to show that the individual did not comprehend the essence of the act. Countries like Germany, Thailand, Argentina, etc., have abolished the plea completely. In this scenario, establishing a functional, research-based risk assessment and mental screening process can facilitate the judicial process and acknowledge mentally ill people's rights.

[Author Ms Neha Singh is currently pursuing M.A in Criminology at National Forensic Sciences University, Gandhinagar]


Sidhartha Vashisht @ Manu Sharma vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 19 April 2010.

Vikas Yadav vs State Of U.P And Ors. Etc. Etc on 3 October 2016.

Choudhary, Archita. “Justice For The Criminal Psychopaths: Punishment Or Treatment?” Christ University, Bangalore, Christ University, Bangalore, 2018,

Dhananjay Mahapatra / TNN / Jun 7, 2007. “Psychopaths Can't Plead Lunacy: SC: India News - Times of India.” The Times of India, TOI, 7 June 2007, 2:07,

Vargas, Theresa. “Brutally Killed by Charles Manson's followers, Sharon Tate Became the Face of Victims' Rights.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 12 June 2020,

Liked the article ?
Share this:


india ads fairnesscreams tv ads ban proposal anti ageing creams government 2006 micro small review big India Juvenile Justice rights Women justice Jurisdiction Constitution caa secularism amendment sedition Arbitration consumer complaint filing international laws wildlife protection animal laws USA china women empowerment pornography legal prostitution sex trafficking laws legalising Economy Measures RBI Coronavirus Reserve Bank of India stability coronavirus impact liquidity shantikanta das monetary policy repo rate moratorium disinformation fake news state of frenzy social media anger hate issue EpidemicDiseaseAct uniformcivilcode equality secular illegalimmigrants immigration assisteddying euthanasia police brutality custodial violence police efforts jail separation divorce hindu marriage family laws economic slowdown unemployment percapitaincome inflation GDP growth aggregate demand commercial surrogacy bill armed forces equal rights landmark judgement indian army transgender living conditions third gender Disability rights rape law Criminal law IPC Internship Program regulatory sandbox IRDA framework IRDA guidelines live environment RBI regulations pollution womeninmates punishment sexualassault wrongfulconvictions IPR EnvironmentLaws JudicialActivism Jurisprudence Internship singleparent adoption niti manthan prison reforms Niti manthan e-fradus cyber crimes It Laws Medico legal aid Media technology and democracy legal literacy Body Offences Housing infrastructure indian law global laws right to health fundamental right article 21 Indian penal code criminal law crimes against women rapecases IntellectualPropertyRights Trademark NuclearSecurity Cyberlaws judiciary petitions mercy petition review petition curative petition zero draft human rights business United nations ADR Law mediation negotiation conciliation Mahatama Gandhi economics technology technological unemployment network online consumption production working remotely law of sedition article 19 right to freedom and expression moblynching violence offence animalrights gayparenting pronouns fundamental duties Indian law Constitution of India covid19 criminal justice system constitutional administrative litigation Courts order commission report speedy trial Corrections legal aid legislature Police Successionlaw casestudy SARFAESI e-debate maritalrape 498A IPC Misuse nirbhaya rape case death penalty deterent theory covid-19 force majuere events Force Majeure Clauses coronavirus outbreak doctorine of frustration clauses contract UAPA 2019 Review indigenous people LabourLaws Familylaw dowry death white collar crimes plea bargaining menstruation myths defamation forgery events Results Phase 2 trespass mental health intellectual property rights Patent rights crimes lockdown child abuse traditional crime crime rate phishing ransomware cybercrime malware domestic violence doctoring lis pendens applicability conditions insensitive media coverage media Death murder News channel ayodhya judgement Group Discussion Exceprts naturaljustice legalprincipals Supremecourt crpc Bail Legalethics legal guidelines telemedicine legal issues Laws Section 269 Section 270 cholera privacy concern Divorce Muslim Women retention of property yemen conflict competition law enforcement 10 years administrativelaw PiracyLaw juvenile justice EIA Draft 2020 30th June 2020 Environmental Impact Assessment Climate Change Laws Dissent Research Group juvenile crimes Administration environment conservation Sustainable Oceans Énvironment Service laws Compassionate Appointments policy legislation webinar scientist climatologist report policy change TPA property patent law section 144 principles of natural justice justice delayed instant justice work from home InformationTechnology persons with disabilities discrimination health girls disease community duties individual contemporary world common interests duality MRTP Act Indian economy competition commission of india Competition Act appraisal singaporean court section 377 Navtej singh judgement IHL war crimes humanitarian law ipc beyond india extra territorial jurisdiction wife maintenance desertion marriage #digital strike #cyber security chinese apps #chinese apps #ad-hoc arbitration #institutional arbitration #environmental law #environment #human rights #strict liability Lok Adalats US-India Abortion laws Live-in-relationships Indian Judiciary Universal Healthcare Rules Based World Order. YL3 victim dying declaration wish last wish truth balanced cooperative bank sarfaesi act Internet Ban Censorship Website Ban #DPSP #state #covid #IP black money racism Skin colour Political system Unrest accountability Jammu and Kashmir Article 370 Abrogation Kidnapping and Abduction Indo-Nepal brutality dk basu guidelines Conflict Changing dynamics democracy international disputes prostitution in India extradition laws and treaties Surrogacy laws case study Law and Order society Legal Implications regulatory framework Betting Gambling Seventh Schedule Central Government Betting Laws Rights of a Man cyber delinquency Juvenile Justice Act Doctrine Part Performance Section 53-A CERC sustainable development Grid Code electricity laws electricity control Mental HealthCare Act WHO National Trust Act Disaster Mangement Indian legal Framework Female Criminality social structure Corporate Laws Corporate Veil Company Election Laws Electoral Reforms Law Commission of India Article 324 Election Commission contempt of court rule of law supreme court principle of natural justice judges criticism high court Fertility Assisted Reproductive Technology Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill Legal Evolution Literature growth goods and services Predatory Pricing Market legal remedies cryptocurrency virtual currency santhanam committee ethical behavior border military LAC Aksai Chin revenge porn FIR SC/ ST Reservation artificialintelligence Privacy privacy specialmarriageact constitutional constitutionality Article 139A Education National Education Policy HRDMinistry feminism Gender Inequality Sex god juristic personality PIL earth nature ecosystem public trust Section 420 ASCI Advertisements Covid-19 Online Dispute Resolution dispute JusticeOnTime Cyber Space Security election Cloning Senior citizens Human Rights arrest CrPC procedural laws curative legislation Ration card Judicial Review Writ Jurisdiction Internet Covid19 indian passport foreigners-act extradition law laws in India Inheritance Laws Section 6 Domicile CLAT NLU belgium extradition treaty vicarious liability law of torts common law International Commercial Arbitration Private Defence Legal Right energy consumption national solar mission international law economic sanction tax structure Reforms NDPS Act Section64A genocide research projects internships summer school Virtual Courts Digital India NDHM Press Regulation italian-marines fishermen kerala international waters arbitration womenrights witchhunting janaushadischeme healthcare laws medical national health policy healthcare national digital health mission world health organisation legal jurisprudente draft health data management 2020 concerns drawbacks ministry of health and family affair sting operations media trial press rights right to privacy Twitter Prashant Bhushan period leave probate essentials for will will Technical biometrics Laws for women settlement mandalcommission 30 years gandhi principles Indianlegalsystem nitimanthan CELRA Climate Change Phase 3 sakshiaggarwal communication skills youcanskilldevelopment client counselling soumikghoshal sbi protest farm acts agriculture farmers anti-farmers men Executive power constitutional law Article 73 finance transparency political parties bonds Sexual Harassment Ministry of Human Resource Development Educational Reforms sabarimala case untouchability cruelty misuse by women gender biased 488A ban of apps section 69A tiktok app compensation section 357A state s bankruptcy Insolvency_law_committee ibc insolvency_bankruptcy_act insolvency nclt students accessibility internet #righttoeducation nuclear weapon treaty legality advisory opinion international restorative justice punishment theory copyright law distance education virtual teaching Fundamental Rights Rape SC/ST Forest Rights Act Forest Conservation bitcoin child vaccination ibc suspension financial creditors ministry of corporate affairs substantial acquisition takeover public announcement control out of court settlement history banking law sebi stressed assets banking regulation dispute resolution professionalism private sector fund sourcing banks publication copyright infringement publishing house penguin environmental jurisprudence 2020 indian legal system acquisition section 62 convertible investees companies act ABUSE ONLINE IPC CRIME WOMEN INDIA ONLINE ABUSE WOMEN CRIME CRIMINAL LAW registrations open competition sushruta apply extempore centre for medical and health law ethic studies medical and health law sex workers prevention religion extra-territorial technological advancement cerestrial environment_protection infrastructure goa doctrineofpleasure crown Arrest code of civil procedure offender access to justice concilation remedy presidentialelections developing nations tiktok universal health coverage comedians freedom of speech and expression OTT Platforms Content Regulation Section 375 forced marriages Precautionary measures Guidelines covid crisis women assault section 353 cops andhra pradesh chief minister dream 11 economic impact online gambling salary income tax rti spam troll misinformation data protection methods civil law section 118 kerala police act section 66a animal rights slaughter customs act CAROTAR FTA TARRIF rules of origin hardship of importer separation of power rights of animals need for amendement meagre punishment legitimacy constitutionalism liability right to healthy environment degrading environment social responsibility restructuring mergers amalgamation traffacking turkey challenge accepted outrage unity child rights rte right to education non-access conclusive proof marital relationships matrimony arbitral award thorium atomic energy act nuclear energy nuclear power atomic energy swadhar home widows vrindavan infringement comparative advertisement trademarks act income tax act non resident indians FEMA MONARCHY SIKKIM namgyal dynasty partner state ONUS guilty Burden of proof legal burden parties self defense legal right prostitutes Winter school International Criminal Law Ministry of Finance Welfare Digital Budget Finance Budget 2021 Democracy Coups Myanmar Voter Fraud Corruption corrupt governments voter fraud unrecognized ineffective Dictators projects development jungle capital assets funds partership water riparian basin collaboration advocate amit mazumdar soft skills advocacy terrorism massacres gun ICC ivorycoast LaurentGbagbo Space Policy Treaties Space Outer space Foreign award public policy ZERO FIR LAW INDIA PROPERTY RIGHTS DAUGHTER WOMEN RIGHTS AMENDEMENTS HINDU SUCCCESSION distributed ledger technology block chains digital age Exception 2 Habeas Corpus Case Adults Care and Protection Juvenile delinquency Medical Negligence Due Care Criminal Liability Civil Liability Stockholm Conference Uniform Civil Code Personal Laws mental disorder mental health care act advance directive bail sentence CEDAW NCRB Sexual abuse International Bill of Rights POCSO Act Comparative analysis Ted Talk Renewable Energy Trend Energy Projection advaadvance directiv,psychiatry Schedule VII of CA 2013 Amendment 2019 Companies Act 2013 CSR Promoting Innovation and Creativity World Intellectual Property Organisation Restructuring Education Global Innovation Index American Bar Association Offshoring Legal Services Legal Process Outsourcing Marital Rape executive Payment and Settlement System Act of 2007 anti-money laundering Fintech Online Education Inclusion of Technology 5+3+3+4 Design law students call for papers authors editors medical students coparcenory partition safety acts healthworker Policy change Housing Rent Model law Projects Tenancy Central Vista Project Parliament of India supreme court of India space debris Earth orbit Deportation International Law exploitation convention equity lawyer movement public interest intoxication alcohol defence involuntary Immoral Traffic Prevention Act Euthanasia, Mercy Killing, Passive Euthanasia, Difference between Active and Passive Euthanasia, Aruna Shanbaug Case, Right to life, Article 21, Right to Die, Supreme Court, Guidelines regarding Euthanasia. peace challenges policies public