April 23, 2021, 8:43 p.m.   singhsakshi142211  
Pens of Law students    

Profile of Author-Jai Dogra is a 4th-year law student pursuing B.A.L.L.B. (Hons.) from Amity Law School, Delhi (affiliated to GGSIPU).


A Joint Hindu family comprises all lineally descended persons having a common ancestor and wives and unmarried daughters. Joint Family is a naturally occurring phenomenon in the Indian cultural society set-up. The family is joint only in the estate but also in the kitchen and place of worship. However, the existence of an estate is not an essential condition for a joint family. A joint family can exist even without a joint family estate. If the estate is separately divided among the members of the family, then the family ceases to be joint. But the mere division in place of worship and kitchen does not amount to a severance of status of joint family. A Hindu family is presumed to be joint unless the contrary is proved. Therefore, the burden of proving the severance is on the person who alleges separation.

Coparcenary is a narrower concept than a joint family. Coparcener is a term coined for the people in a joint family setup who have a birthright in the joint family property. The pith of coparcenary lies in the unity of ownership. It extends up to three generations next to the holder that is sons, grandsons, great-grandsons for a particular time being. It extends up to three generations because only these male descendants are proficient to offer spiritual offerings to their ancestors. The coparcenary was confined to male descendants only under Mitakshara law. However, the marriage expenses of an unmarried daughter were deducted from a joint family property at the onset of partition. The right to seek partition is limited to major coparceners. The coparcenary right in the estate is fluctuating in nature. The share of each coparcener scales down with the birth and scales up with the death of the coparcener. Partition crystalizes the fluctuating interest in the joint family property into definite individual shares.

The power of managing the joint family property is vested in the hands of Karta in the Hindu joint family. Ordinarily, Karta is the senior-most coparcener in a joint family. He has the responsibility of managing the affairs and property of the family. The members of HUF live in the protection of Karta.


The coparceners have various rights in the Joint family property. It includes: right to common possession and enjoyment; right to enforce partition; right to restrain unauthorized act by other coparceners; right of alienation of undivided interest with permission of other coparceners; right to set aside unauthorized alienation. However, the right of coparcenary was limited to male descendants up to three generations before 2005.

The dynamics have considerably changed after the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act of 2005. Now, the daughter is a coparcener in a Hindu joint family. Also, she is entitled to an equal share at par with the son. Recently, the Supreme Court of India in Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma has clarified the rights of the daughter. The Court said that the daughter is entitled to equivalent coparcenary rights even if the father has died before the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act of 2005 and regardless that she was born before the amendment. It is a right that a daughter acquires by birth. The right is restricted to daughters only and does not extend to wives of the coparceners.

Although daughters are on the same pedestal as that of a son in coparcenary, are they really benefitting from the present law? The concept of Hindu joint family property is plummeting in society. The article seeks to highlight the plight of diminishing joint family property that has rendered coparcenary right of daughter into nugatory. The various reasons that have appended the decline of joint family property are henceforth stated.


A nuclear family is a family where husband and wife live together with or without their unmarried children. The family structure in India has seen a shift towards the nuclearization of families due to industrialization, urbanization, education, and upliftment in the status of Indian women. During recent decades, there has been a radical decline in joint family set-ups in India. The social fabric of the country is changing due to the emergence of nuclear families. As per census reports, nuclear households have seen a rise of 52.1% in 2011 from 51.7% in the year 2001. The upsurge is exponential as it is coupled with a drastic rise of the population as well.

The dwindling of joint families has shattered the concept of ancestral property. How good is a right of coparcenary when in actuality there exists hardly any ancestral property?


Separate property is the exclusive property of an individual to which the owner has an absolute right. It is not liable to be partitioned unless the owner himself treats it as a joint family estate. Even the descendants of the owner do not enjoy birthright in it. Self-acquired property is a separate property of the member of the coparcenary. It is a property that is acquired by a Hindu which is not ancestral in nature. The onus of proving the property as separate is on the person who alleges it to be self-acquired and not joint. There is a presumption of jointness in respect of the property as well. However, it does not mean that every property would be joint family property.

The income earned by a member of the joint family through a profession that requires special training was considered as an income of the joint family. Provided that the expense of training is imparted/aided wholly or partly through the funds of the joint family. However, the abovementioned rule has dramatically changed by the provisions of the Hindu Gains of Learning Act of 1930. Now, the gains of the learning of a member in a joint family are the separate property of that member. Where the ‘gains of learning’ refers to all acquisitions of property made through such learning. And ‘learning’ is referred to as education (technical, elementary, special, or general) that aids a person to pursue any profession or trade. The Supreme Court of India in K.S. Subbiah Pillai v. Commissioner of Income-tax has said that the income of the person would be his separate property if it is earned by his own exertions and without the aid of joint family funds.

The legislation has indeed contributed towards the formation of separate property out of the joint family property. Even though the joint family property is diminishing, there are other factors too that deprive the daughter to exercise to right over the property.


A deed of relinquishment needs to be registered under section 17 of The Registration Act. It must be in writing with or without consideration. It is a legal document through which a person gives away his/her right to ancestral property for the other legal heirs. It is a tool used by the male coparceners to procure the share of the daughter in the joint family property. The signing of the No Objection Certificate (NOC) is also a medium through which daughters give away the right to ancestral property. NOC certifies that the person signing it has no objection if the concerned property is transferred to some other person.

A daughter in a family is bought up with such value & ethics that she is made to believe that the property belongs to the son and that one day she has to cater to the needs of in-laws after her marriage. The elite class and the people of higher strata are an exception to this typical Indian family setup. However, the majority of the population lives in rural India, and a homogeneous legal system governs society. Many daughters relinquish their rights in the joint family property out of love and values embedded in them.


The general rules of female succession who dies intestate are laid down in section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The female property would devolve first upon sons, daughters (including children of predeceased son or daughter), and husband. Secondly, it would devolve upon the heirs of the husband; thirdly, upon heirs of the father; fourthly, upon heirs of the mother.

It is pertinent to note that the parents of a woman are having right over the property of their daughter after the heirs of her husband. Also, the heirs of the father are given priority over the heirs of the mother. The preferential order of female succession seems misogynistic per se. Lastly, it would devolve to the heirs of the mother who is a woman which means the same patriarchal cycle would follow.

Also, if a property has evolved in the hands of a woman from her parents or in-laws and she dies issueless, the property shall devolve upon the heirs of the father or the husband as the case may be and not to her heirs. It is like taking back the right over the property from a woman that she might have legally succeeded. This provision gives an inference that the woman has limited ownership of the property. Which goes against the right of ‘absolute ownership of property possessed by a woman’ under section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The order of succession seems to be purloining the vested right of the property from Hindu females.


The amendment in 2005 and the recent judgment of Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma are some of the celebrated footsteps taken by our legal system in the path of the welfare of Hindu females. However, there is still a stairway to surpass.

Although daughters are at par with sons in terms of rights in coparcenary property, however, what social good would it do without a coparcenary property? It is indeed a pertinent question to be answered by the framers of the law. The property is ancestral only when there is an existence of a three-generational coparcenary. It is indeed an uncommon phenomenon during the prevalence of the nuclear family concept in India. Also, there still exists a tinge of patriarchy in the prevalent legal system that needs to be looked upon.


What is ‘absolute ownership of property possessed by a woman’?

Ans. Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act of 1956 states that a Hindu female can possess property as an absolute owner and not merely as a limited owner. A woman could only hold property as a limited owner before the enactment of the 1956 act.

Disclaimer-This article is an original submission of the Author. Niti Manthan does not hold any liability arising out of this article. Kindly refer to our Terms of use or write to us in case of any concerns.

Commissioner of Income-tax v. Luxminarayan, (1935) 59 Bom 618.

Sri Raghunada v. Brozoa Kishor, (1876) 1 Mad. 69.

Pandit Mohan Lal v. Pandit Ram Dayal, (1941) 16 Luck 708.

Cowdary Ganesh Dutt v. Jewach, (1904) 31 I.A. 10.

Radhamani v. Roopnarayan, A.I.R. 1971 S.C. 1962.

Narendra v. W.T. Commissioner, A.I.R. 1970 SC 14.

IT Commissioner, Bihar v. Sandhya Rani Dutta, A.I.R. 2001 S.C. 1155.

Shanker v. Official Receiver, A.I.R. 1977 Mad 171.

Jatru Padhan v. Ambikaji, A.I.R. 1957 Pat 570.

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, No. 30, Acts of Parliament, 1956, § 6.

2020 S.C.C. OnLine S.C. 641.

MASLOW, ABRAHAM 1954, MOTIVATION, AND PERSONALITY. (Harper Collins Publishers New York, 3rd ed. 1987).

Sandeep Narlekar, Disintegration of Joint Family System, FORBES INDIA (Dec. 14, 2017, 11:20 AM), https://www.forbesindia.com/blog/beyond-the-numbers/disintegration-of-the-joint-family-system-emergence-of-nuclear-family/#:~:text=There%20has%20been%20a%20gradual,have%20more%20than%20two%20children.

Government of India, CENSUS OF INDIA 2011, https://censusindia.gov.in/2011Census/pes/Pesreport.pdf.


Ram Kisan v. Tundamal, A.I.R 10 I.C. 543.

Metharam v. Revachand, (1918) 45 Cal 666.

The Hindu Gains of Learning Act, 1930, No. 30, 1930, § 3.

Id., § 5(d).

Id., § 2(c).

A.I.R. 1999 S.C. 1220.

The Registration Act, 1908, No. 16, 1908, § 17.

The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, No. 30, Acts of Parliament, 1956, § 15.

Id., § 15(2).

Liked the article ?
Share this:


india ads fairnesscreams tv ads ban proposal anti ageing creams government 2006 micro small review big India Juvenile Justice rights Women justice Jurisdiction Constitution caa secularism amendment sedition Arbitration consumer complaint filing international laws wildlife protection animal laws USA china women empowerment pornography legal prostitution sex trafficking laws legalising Economy Measures RBI Coronavirus Reserve Bank of India stability coronavirus impact liquidity shantikanta das monetary policy repo rate moratorium disinformation fake news state of frenzy social media anger hate issue EpidemicDiseaseAct uniformcivilcode equality secular illegalimmigrants immigration assisteddying euthanasia police brutality custodial violence police efforts jail separation divorce hindu marriage family laws economic slowdown unemployment percapitaincome inflation GDP growth aggregate demand commercial surrogacy bill armed forces equal rights landmark judgement indian army transgender living conditions third gender Disability rights rape law Criminal law IPC Internship Program regulatory sandbox IRDA framework IRDA guidelines live environment RBI regulations pollution womeninmates punishment sexualassault wrongfulconvictions IPR EnvironmentLaws JudicialActivism Jurisprudence Internship singleparent adoption niti manthan prison reforms Niti manthan e-fradus cyber crimes It Laws Medico legal aid Media technology and democracy legal literacy Body Offences Housing infrastructure indian law global laws right to health fundamental right article 21 Indian penal code criminal law crimes against women rapecases IntellectualPropertyRights Trademark NuclearSecurity Cyberlaws judiciary petitions mercy petition review petition curative petition zero draft human rights business United nations ADR Law mediation negotiation conciliation Mahatama Gandhi economics technology technological unemployment network online consumption production working remotely law of sedition article 19 right to freedom and expression moblynching violence offence animalrights gayparenting pronouns fundamental duties Indian law Constitution of India covid19 criminal justice system constitutional administrative litigation Courts order commission report speedy trial Corrections legal aid legislature Police Successionlaw casestudy SARFAESI e-debate maritalrape 498A IPC Misuse nirbhaya rape case death penalty deterent theory covid-19 force majuere events Force Majeure Clauses coronavirus outbreak doctorine of frustration clauses contract UAPA 2019 Review indigenous people LabourLaws Familylaw dowry death white collar crimes plea bargaining menstruation myths defamation forgery events Results Phase 2 trespass mental health intellectual property rights Patent rights crimes lockdown child abuse traditional crime crime rate phishing ransomware cybercrime malware domestic violence doctoring lis pendens applicability conditions insensitive media coverage media Death murder News channel ayodhya judgement Group Discussion Exceprts naturaljustice legalprincipals Supremecourt crpc Bail Legalethics legal guidelines telemedicine legal issues Laws Section 269 Section 270 cholera privacy concern Divorce Muslim Women retention of property yemen conflict competition law enforcement 10 years administrativelaw PiracyLaw juvenile justice EIA Draft 2020 30th June 2020 Environmental Impact Assessment Climate Change Laws Dissent Research Group juvenile crimes Administration environment conservation Sustainable Oceans Énvironment Service laws Compassionate Appointments policy legislation webinar scientist climatologist report policy change TPA property patent law section 144 principles of natural justice justice delayed instant justice work from home InformationTechnology persons with disabilities discrimination health girls disease community duties individual contemporary world common interests duality MRTP Act Indian economy competition commission of india Competition Act appraisal singaporean court section 377 Navtej singh judgement IHL war crimes humanitarian law ipc beyond india extra territorial jurisdiction wife maintenance desertion marriage #digital strike #cyber security chinese apps #chinese apps #ad-hoc arbitration #institutional arbitration #environmental law #environment #human rights #strict liability Lok Adalats US-India Abortion laws Live-in-relationships Indian Judiciary Universal Healthcare Rules Based World Order. YL3 victim dying declaration wish last wish truth balanced cooperative bank sarfaesi act Internet Ban Censorship Website Ban #DPSP #state #covid #IP black money racism Skin colour Political system Unrest accountability Jammu and Kashmir Article 370 Abrogation Kidnapping and Abduction Indo-Nepal brutality dk basu guidelines Conflict Changing dynamics democracy international disputes prostitution in India extradition laws and treaties Surrogacy laws case study Law and Order society Legal Implications regulatory framework Betting Gambling Seventh Schedule Central Government Betting Laws Rights of a Man cyber delinquency Juvenile Justice Act Doctrine Part Performance Section 53-A CERC sustainable development Grid Code electricity laws electricity control Mental HealthCare Act WHO National Trust Act Disaster Mangement Indian legal Framework Female Criminality social structure Corporate Laws Corporate Veil Company Election Laws Electoral Reforms Law Commission of India Article 324 Election Commission contempt of court rule of law supreme court principle of natural justice judges criticism high court Fertility Assisted Reproductive Technology Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill Legal Evolution Literature growth goods and services Predatory Pricing Market legal remedies cryptocurrency virtual currency santhanam committee ethical behavior border military LAC Aksai Chin revenge porn FIR SC/ ST Reservation artificialintelligence Privacy privacy specialmarriageact constitutional constitutionality Article 139A Education National Education Policy HRDMinistry feminism Gender Inequality Sex god juristic personality PIL earth nature ecosystem public trust Section 420 ASCI Advertisements Covid-19 Online Dispute Resolution dispute JusticeOnTime Cyber Space Security election Cloning Senior citizens Human Rights arrest CrPC procedural laws curative legislation Ration card Judicial Review Writ Jurisdiction Internet Covid19 indian passport foreigners-act extradition law laws in India Inheritance Laws Section 6 Domicile CLAT NLU belgium extradition treaty vicarious liability law of torts common law International Commercial Arbitration Private Defence Legal Right energy consumption national solar mission international law economic sanction tax structure Reforms NDPS Act Section64A genocide research projects internships summer school Virtual Courts Digital India NDHM Press Regulation italian-marines fishermen kerala international waters arbitration womenrights witchhunting janaushadischeme healthcare laws medical national health policy healthcare national digital health mission world health organisation legal jurisprudente draft health data management 2020 concerns drawbacks ministry of health and family affair sting operations media trial press rights right to privacy Twitter Prashant Bhushan period leave probate essentials for will will Technical biometrics Laws for women settlement mandalcommission 30 years gandhi principles Indianlegalsystem nitimanthan CELRA Climate Change Phase 3 sakshiaggarwal communication skills youcanskilldevelopment client counselling soumikghoshal sbi protest farm acts agriculture farmers anti-farmers men Executive power constitutional law Article 73 finance transparency political parties bonds Sexual Harassment Ministry of Human Resource Development Educational Reforms sabarimala case untouchability cruelty misuse by women gender biased 488A ban of apps section 69A tiktok app compensation section 357A state s bankruptcy Insolvency_law_committee ibc insolvency_bankruptcy_act insolvency nclt students accessibility internet #righttoeducation nuclear weapon treaty legality advisory opinion international restorative justice punishment theory copyright law distance education virtual teaching Fundamental Rights Rape SC/ST Forest Rights Act Forest Conservation bitcoin child vaccination ibc suspension financial creditors ministry of corporate affairs substantial acquisition takeover public announcement control out of court settlement history banking law sebi stressed assets banking regulation dispute resolution professionalism private sector fund sourcing banks publication copyright infringement publishing house penguin environmental jurisprudence 2020 indian legal system acquisition section 62 convertible investees companies act ABUSE ONLINE IPC CRIME WOMEN INDIA ONLINE ABUSE WOMEN CRIME CRIMINAL LAW registrations open competition sushruta apply extempore centre for medical and health law ethic studies medical and health law sex workers prevention religion extra-territorial technological advancement cerestrial environment_protection infrastructure goa doctrineofpleasure crown Arrest code of civil procedure offender access to justice concilation remedy presidentialelections developing nations tiktok universal health coverage comedians freedom of speech and expression OTT Platforms Content Regulation Section 375 forced marriages Precautionary measures Guidelines covid crisis women assault section 353 cops andhra pradesh chief minister dream 11 economic impact online gambling salary income tax rti spam troll misinformation data protection methods civil law section 118 kerala police act section 66a animal rights slaughter customs act CAROTAR FTA TARRIF rules of origin hardship of importer separation of power rights of animals need for amendement meagre punishment legitimacy constitutionalism liability right to healthy environment degrading environment social responsibility restructuring mergers amalgamation traffacking turkey challenge accepted outrage unity child rights rte right to education non-access conclusive proof marital relationships matrimony arbitral award thorium atomic energy act nuclear energy nuclear power atomic energy swadhar home widows vrindavan infringement comparative advertisement trademarks act income tax act non resident indians FEMA MONARCHY SIKKIM namgyal dynasty partner state ONUS guilty Burden of proof legal burden parties self defense legal right prostitutes Winter school International Criminal Law Ministry of Finance Welfare Digital Budget Finance Budget 2021 Democracy Coups Myanmar Voter Fraud Corruption corrupt governments voter fraud unrecognized ineffective Dictators projects development jungle capital assets funds partership water riparian basin collaboration advocate amit mazumdar soft skills advocacy terrorism massacres gun ICC ivorycoast LaurentGbagbo Space Policy Treaties Space Outer space Foreign award public policy ZERO FIR LAW INDIA PROPERTY RIGHTS DAUGHTER WOMEN RIGHTS AMENDEMENTS HINDU SUCCCESSION distributed ledger technology block chains digital age Exception 2 Habeas Corpus Case Adults Care and Protection Juvenile delinquency Medical Negligence Due Care Criminal Liability Civil Liability Stockholm Conference Uniform Civil Code Personal Laws mental disorder mental health care act advance directive bail sentence CEDAW NCRB Sexual abuse International Bill of Rights POCSO Act Comparative analysis Ted Talk Renewable Energy Trend Energy Projection advaadvance directiv,psychiatry Schedule VII of CA 2013 Amendment 2019 Companies Act 2013 CSR Promoting Innovation and Creativity World Intellectual Property Organisation Restructuring Education Global Innovation Index American Bar Association Offshoring Legal Services Legal Process Outsourcing Marital Rape executive Payment and Settlement System Act of 2007 anti-money laundering Fintech Online Education Inclusion of Technology 5+3+3+4 Design law students call for papers authors editors medical students coparcenory partition safety acts healthworker Policy change Housing Rent Model law Projects Tenancy Central Vista Project Parliament of India supreme court of India space debris Earth orbit Deportation International Law exploitation convention